November 2005
Volume IV, Issue 2

Dear All,

This November we complete our third year of Trapped Air.  We hope that you have found and continue to find this newsletter both informative and thought-provoking.  We continue to strive to make this newsletter a forum for new technologies, methodologies, and ideas that further the advancement of air testing science.

We have kept ourselves very busy this year with the introduction of Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOC) to our line of air testing.  The feedback we have received since the introduction of TVOC at the AIHce 2005 Conference in Los Angles has been overwhelming.

In this issue we want to bring more to light about what TVOC is, what it means, and what its utility is.  In the article titled "Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) in the Air," Randy Fike, Ph.D. discusses these issues as well as TOVC PELs, and how to measure TVOC.  Other links are provided for those who really want to know more!

We are adding a new section starting with this issue called "The Technical Forum".  It is basically a Q&A taken from the questions we have received from you.  If you have a question or comment that you would like us to address, write us and we will add it to the Forum.

As always, we welcome your feedback and ideas. Please feel free to forward Trapped Air to others as well as to send any suggestions for future issues our way at trappedair@pati-air.com.

Best Regards,
Lester H. Keepper III
President



Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) in the Air
(What does TVOC really mean?)

Randall S. Fike, Ph.D.
Prism Analytical Technologies, Inc. (PATI)
Chief Technical Officer
Director – Analytical Operations

Understanding TVOC

Before getting into the technical aspects of Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs), it is important to understand what is really meant by the term.  A TVOC value is not simply the sum of the volatile organic compounds detected in an analysis.  For example, consider a radio signal received on a car stereo.  Suppose the station is playing a flute solo.  An analysis of the radio signal at any specific moment in time would show a single note or “peak” in the signal (apologies are extended to musically astute for ignoring the harmonics, timbre, etc. here).  If the station were coming in clearly, that single tone would be overwhelming relative to the magnitude of the rest of the tones.  If the same station is playing an organ solo, there might be six clear, distinct tones.  If the station were playing rock music, there would be a distorted conglomerate of discordant tones.  For the last example, now consider a station that is coming in poorly and is playing rock music.  The static or “white noise” would nearly overwhelm the already complex signal.  In each and every case, the radio volume might be the same, but the tonal makeup and complexity would be vastly different.  Such is the case with a TVOC value.  The value includes all of the indistinguishable “chemical noise” as well as the recognizable compounds.  As in the radio analogy, without a significant “total signal”, there is no radio reception; however, a high total signal could be anything from one pure tone to nothing but loud static.  So it is with TVOC, a low TVOC usually indicates that there is no VOC problem (unless, of course, the TVOC value is due to only a small number of compounds); however, a high TVOC value may result from a high level on one single compound or it may be a vast collection of low compound levels from a chemical “soup”, or it may be anything in between.

Note in the following chromatogram the difference in TVOC makeup as compared to the identifiable compounds.


The “hump” in the chromatogram is a collection of undifferentiated hydrocarbons.  Even though many of the individual compounds are not discernable, collectively, they contribute heavily to the TVOC load.

TVOC PELs

Currently there is no specific US standard for the PEL (Permissible Exposure Level) for TVOCs (Total Volatile Organic Compounds) nor is there any specific specification as to the carbon chain length covered.  Even though research and opinions have been published for more than 30 years, questions regarding safe levels or whether or not methane, ethane, and similar low MW compounds should be included still remain and are currently being discussed in the arena of ideas.  However, it is still possible to establish reasonable, workable limits until a specific standard is established.  LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, USGBC) has developed a new standard for Green Buildings of <500 ng/L after its previous standard of <200 ng/L proved unattainable, especially in new buildings.  The European Community has tried to get around the problem of what makes up the TVOC by using a limit of 300 ng/L with no single compound contributing more than 10% of the total.  One large US chemical company uses the standard of <500 ng/L as their target for non-manufacturing areas, 500-1000 ng/L as the “action level” and >1000 ng/L as the “immediate action level”.  The literature generally seems to agree that <300 ng/L represents an “acceptable” TVOC level and that >3000 ng/L represents a “hazardous” TVOC level; however, few seem to want to address the hazards involved with levels between 300 and 3000 ng/L.  Part of this problem rests in the fact that many office residents enjoy VOC’s from perfumes and odorants (cleaning products, scented candles, potpourri, air fresheners etc.) and work to increase the background level while other office residents are not so inclined and may actually suffer from nausea, headaches, and other symptoms as a result.

The recognized symptoms above 3000 ng/L generally include drowsiness, eye and respiratory irritation, general malaise, headache, nausea, and exacerbation of symptoms of respiratory ailments.  Some data suggests that high TVOC levels amplify the hazardous effects of specific, harmful VOCs.  In addition, there is some empirical information from IH consultants who perform medically driven environmental investigations, which indicates that typically acceptable levels are too high by a factor of two or more for chemically sensitive individuals.

Prism Analytical Technologies, Inc. (PATI) has worked with the available literature, large chemical companies, and many IH consultants active in the IAQ field as well as using our own consultative data correlating symptoms to TVOC levels to establish the following table defining the limits and effects of TVOC concentrations:

Further, PATI has defined the low molecular weight limit for VOCs included in the TVOC value to include C1 and C2 halogenates and oxygenates (such as formaldehyde, and C1 CFCs) but exclude C<3 hydrocarbons.  The high molecular weight limit for included VOCs is C15.

Measuring TVOC and How PATI Measures and Reports TVOC

Several devices are available that do an acceptable job estimating TVOC including PID (Photoionization Detectors), AirCuity monitors, the Nose (by Pure Choice), and several others.  These are especially useful for continuous monitoring or for obtaining real-time data.  However, the use of GC-FID (Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detector) or GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) will provide the most accurate and useful data although GC-FID has the drawback of not providing secondary verification of compound identity.  PATI uses GC-MS in determining the TVOC value because, should a question arise as to the identity of the specific compounds contributing to the TVOC, it is possible to use the mass spectral verification feature to do a full TDT Air Scan analysis of the data without having to take another sample.  This feature is included in PATI’s MoldScan Plus and GreenScan analyses where a TVOC value is reported.  If the TVOC is low, usually no additional analysis is required. However, if the TVOC level is high, a full 300+ compound, TDT Air Scan® analysis can be requested.

For additional reading on the subject, consider these resources:

Technical Guide to the Investigation of Indoor Air Quality in Office Buildings:
http://iaqconsultant.com/10.htm (see section 5.2.7)

Indoor Air Quality Investigations:
http://www.cyberus.ca/~dsw/iat/pdf/iatinvestigations.pdf

Indoor air quality and health:
http://www.chinaiecp.org/jsyd/lwwx/018.pdf

Toxnet website:
http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov (Under “Search All Databases” enter “TVOC” and click on “Search”. After the search is complete, click on the number following “TOXLINE Special” for abstracts of about 50 technical articles)

Also, do a Google or Dogpile search using “Lars Molhave” as the key words



The Technical Forum

Q.   What is sub-slab sampling?

A.   Sub-Slab sampling is done to look for and identify chemicals that are diffusing into the occupied space from under a concrete floor.  The chemicals were spilled before the floor was poured, were spilled after the floor was poured and seeped down through cracks, or migrated under the slab through the groundwater.  TDT Air Scan® is ideal for sub-slab sampling because there is no need to destroy the floor to take a sample of the soil/sand/gravel underneath.  All that is needed is a 3/8 inch diameter hole through the concrete at the desired location.  Place a sample tube ½ inch from the bottom of the hole and pull an air sample using a personal monitoring pump.  TDT Air Scan® surveys for over 300 compounds using one sample tube.  For more information contact PATI.

Q.   What is TDT Air Scan®?

A.   TDT Air Scan® uses a multi-matrix sorption tube that is designed to trap a wide range of compounds from the air.  These include both polar and non-polar compounds.  After sampling, the sorption tube is sent to PATI for the quantitative or semiquantitative identification of over 300 compounds.



In the News

There are many problems associated with indoor air quality (IAQ) issues, like musty smells, sore throats, coughs, headaches, watery eyes etc….  And there are consequences of not recognizing IAQ problems. John Bruce in a two part article explains some of these issues.

Part I, Coming to Grips with Indoor Air Quality Problems

Part II, Reacting to Indoor Air Quality Problems



Does your company have an interesting IAQ project that you would like to share? Please tell us about it.  Just call or email us with your story and we'll help you turn it into an article for Trapped Air.

trappedair@pati-air.com
Phone: (989) 772-5088



Copyright © 2002-2005 Prism Analytical Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Have a Case Study to Share?

We encourage you to alert us to successes you’ve had using PATI products so that we may feature you as a case study in an upcoming issue of Trapped Air.

Typical Guideline for Trapped Air Case Study

• THE PROBLEM:
• WHAT WAS AT STAKE?
• THE PROPOSED SOLUTION:
• WHAT WAS FOUND?
• HOW DID PATI HELP?
• THE RESULT:

At the end of the case study:

A historical overview with one paragraph on the writer and his or her history, one paragraph on your company - where appropriate, and one paragraph on your position / relationship with PATI.


Look for in upcoming issues:

• Green Building IAQ
• Meth lab detection


CONTACT US

trappedair@pati-air.com
Phone: (989) 772-5088
Fax: (989) 772-5870

PATI
1200 N. Fancher
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858


Learn more about MoldScanPLUS™ visit us at www.pati-air.com;



Acronym Helper

GC-FID – Gas Chromatography – Flame Ionization Detector

GC-MS - Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry

LEED - Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, program put out by U.S. Green Building Council

PEL – Permissible Exposure Level

PID – Photoionization Detector

VOC – Volatile Organic Compound

TLV – Threshold Limit Value

TWA – Time-Weighted Average




Do you have your PATI Air Analytical Tool Box ?

To receive a copy of PATI Air Analytical Tool Box click here Tool Box

PATI is a consultative air testing lab which means we encourage you to ask questions whether you are in the planning stage of an air study or have questions regarding your analytical report.  When planning your next air project be sure to consult your PATI Tool Box.  Quick easy to look up charts are provided for each analysis.  Put our experience to work for you.