November 2005 Volume IV, Issue 2
Dear
All,
This November we complete our third year of
Trapped Air. We hope that you have found and continue to find
this newsletter both informative and thought-provoking. We
continue to strive to make this newsletter a forum for new
technologies, methodologies, and ideas that further the advancement
of air testing science.
We have kept ourselves very busy this
year with the introduction of Total Volatile Organic Compounds
(TVOC) to our line of air testing. The feedback we have
received since the introduction of TVOC at the AIHce 2005 Conference
in Los Angles has been overwhelming.
In this issue we want to
bring more to light about what TVOC is, what it means, and what its
utility is. In the article titled "Total Volatile Organic
Compounds (TVOCs) in the Air," Randy Fike, Ph.D. discusses these
issues as well as TOVC PELs, and how to measure TVOC. Other
links are provided for those who really want to know more!
We
are adding a new section starting with this issue called "The
Technical Forum". It is basically a Q&A taken from the
questions we have received from you. If you have a question or
comment that you would like us to address, write us and we will add
it to the Forum.
As always, we welcome your feedback
and ideas. Please feel free to forward Trapped Air to others as well
as to send any suggestions for future issues our way at trappedair@pati-air.com.
Best Regards, Lester H. Keepper III President
Total Volatile
Organic Compounds (TVOCs) in the Air (What does TVOC really
mean?) |
Randall
S. Fike, Ph.D. Prism Analytical Technologies, Inc.
(PATI) Chief Technical Officer Director – Analytical
Operations
Before getting into the
technical aspects of Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs), it is
important to understand what is really meant by the term. A
TVOC value is not simply the sum of the volatile organic compounds
detected in an analysis. For example, consider a radio signal
received on a car stereo. Suppose the station is playing a
flute solo. An analysis of the radio signal at any specific
moment in time would show a single note or “peak” in the signal
(apologies are extended to musically astute for ignoring the
harmonics, timbre, etc. here). If the station were coming in
clearly, that single tone would be overwhelming relative to the
magnitude of the rest of the tones. If the same station is
playing an organ solo, there might be six clear, distinct tones.
If the station were playing rock music, there would be a
distorted conglomerate of discordant tones. For the last
example, now consider a station that is coming in poorly and is
playing rock music. The static or “white noise” would nearly
overwhelm the already complex signal. In each and every case,
the radio volume might be the same, but the tonal makeup and
complexity would be vastly different. Such is the case with a
TVOC value. The value includes all of the indistinguishable
“chemical noise” as well as the recognizable compounds. As in
the radio analogy, without a significant “total signal”, there is no
radio reception; however, a high total signal could be anything from
one pure tone to nothing but loud static. So it is with TVOC,
a low TVOC usually indicates that there is no VOC problem (unless,
of course, the TVOC value is due to only a small number of
compounds); however, a high TVOC value may result from a high level
on one single compound or it may be a vast collection of low
compound levels from a chemical “soup”, or it may be anything in
between.
Note in the following chromatogram the difference
in TVOC makeup as compared to the identifiable compounds.
 | The “hump” in the
chromatogram is a collection of undifferentiated hydrocarbons.
Even though many of the individual compounds are not
discernable, collectively, they contribute heavily to the TVOC load.
Currently there is no specific US standard for the PEL
(Permissible Exposure Level) for TVOCs (Total Volatile Organic
Compounds) nor is there any specific specification as to the carbon
chain length covered. Even though research and opinions have
been published for more than 30 years, questions regarding safe
levels or whether or not methane, ethane, and similar low MW
compounds should be included still remain and are currently being
discussed in the arena of ideas. However, it is still possible
to establish reasonable, workable limits until a specific standard
is established. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design, USGBC) has developed a new standard for Green Buildings of
<500 ng/L after its previous standard of <200 ng/L proved
unattainable, especially in new buildings. The European
Community has tried to get around the problem of what makes up the
TVOC by using a limit of 300 ng/L with no single compound
contributing more than 10% of the total. One large US chemical
company uses the standard of <500 ng/L as their target for
non-manufacturing areas, 500-1000 ng/L as the “action level” and
>1000 ng/L as the “immediate action level”. The literature
generally seems to agree that <300 ng/L represents an
“acceptable” TVOC level and that >3000 ng/L represents a
“hazardous” TVOC level; however, few seem to want to address the
hazards involved with levels between 300 and 3000 ng/L. Part
of this problem rests in the fact that many office residents enjoy
VOC’s from perfumes and odorants (cleaning products, scented
candles, potpourri, air fresheners etc.) and work to increase the
background level while other office residents are not so inclined
and may actually suffer from nausea, headaches, and other symptoms
as a result.
The recognized symptoms above 3000 ng/L
generally include drowsiness, eye and respiratory irritation,
general malaise, headache, nausea, and exacerbation of symptoms of
respiratory ailments. Some data suggests that high TVOC levels
amplify the hazardous effects of specific, harmful VOCs. In
addition, there is some empirical information from IH consultants
who perform medically driven environmental investigations, which
indicates that typically acceptable levels are too high by a factor
of two or more for chemically sensitive individuals.
Prism
Analytical Technologies, Inc. (PATI) has worked with the available
literature, large chemical companies, and many IH consultants active
in the IAQ field as well as using our own consultative data
correlating symptoms to TVOC levels to establish the following table
defining the limits and effects of TVOC concentrations:
|
Further, PATI has defined the low molecular weight limit for VOCs
included in the TVOC value to include C1 and C2 halogenates and
oxygenates (such as formaldehyde, and C1 CFCs) but exclude C<3
hydrocarbons. The high molecular weight limit for included
VOCs is C15.
| Measuring TVOC
and How PATI Measures and Reports TVOC
|
Several
devices are available that do an acceptable job estimating TVOC
including PID (Photoionization Detectors), AirCuity monitors, the
Nose (by Pure Choice), and several others. These are
especially useful for continuous monitoring or for obtaining
real-time data. However, the use of GC-FID (Gas
Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detector) or GC-MS (Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) will provide the most accurate and
useful data although GC-FID has the drawback of not providing
secondary verification of compound identity. PATI uses GC-MS
in determining the TVOC value because, should a question arise as to
the identity of the specific compounds contributing to the TVOC, it
is possible to use the mass spectral verification feature to do a
full TDT Air Scan analysis of the data without having to take
another sample. This feature is included in PATI’s MoldScan
Plus and GreenScan analyses where a TVOC value is reported. If
the TVOC is low, usually no additional analysis is required.
However, if the TVOC level is high, a full 300+ compound, TDT Air
Scan® analysis can be requested.
| For additional
reading on the subject, consider these resources:
|
Technical Guide to the Investigation of Indoor Air
Quality in Office Buildings: http://iaqconsultant.com/10.htm
(see section 5.2.7)
Indoor Air Quality Investigations: http://www.cyberus.ca/~dsw/iat/pdf/iatinvestigations.pdf
Indoor
air quality and health: http://www.chinaiecp.org/jsyd/lwwx/018.pdf
Toxnet
website: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov
(Under “Search All Databases” enter “TVOC” and click on “Search”.
After the search is complete, click on the number following “TOXLINE
Special” for abstracts of about 50 technical articles)
Also, do a Google or Dogpile search using “Lars
Molhave” as the key words
Q. What is sub-slab
sampling?
A. Sub-Slab sampling is done to
look for and identify chemicals that are diffusing into the occupied
space from under a concrete floor. The chemicals were spilled
before the floor was poured, were spilled after the floor was poured
and seeped down through cracks, or migrated under the slab through
the groundwater. TDT Air Scan® is ideal for sub-slab sampling
because there is no need to destroy the floor to take a sample of
the soil/sand/gravel underneath. All that is needed is a 3/8
inch diameter hole through the concrete at the desired location.
Place a sample tube ½ inch from the bottom of the hole and
pull an air sample using a personal monitoring pump. TDT Air
Scan® surveys for over 300 compounds using one sample tube.
For more information contact PATI.
Q.
What is TDT Air Scan®?
A. TDT Air Scan®
uses a multi-matrix sorption tube that is designed to trap a wide
range of compounds from the air. These include both polar and
non-polar compounds. After sampling, the sorption tube is sent
to PATI for the quantitative or semiquantitative identification of
over 300 compounds.
There
are many problems associated with indoor air quality (IAQ) issues,
like musty smells, sore throats, coughs, headaches, watery eyes
etc…. And there are consequences of not recognizing IAQ
problems. John Bruce in a two part article explains some of these
issues.
Part
I, Coming to Grips with Indoor Air Quality Problems
Part
II, Reacting to Indoor Air Quality Problems
|
Does your company
have an interesting IAQ project that you would like to share?
Please tell us about it. Just call or email us with your
story and we'll help you turn it into an article for Trapped
Air.
trappedair@pati-air.com Phone:
(989) 772-5088 |
Copyright ©
2002-2005 Prism Analytical Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Have
a Case Study to Share?
We encourage you to alert us to
successes you’ve had using PATI products so that we may feature you
as a case study in an upcoming issue of Trapped Air.
Typical Guideline for Trapped Air Case Study
• THE PROBLEM: • WHAT WAS AT STAKE? • THE PROPOSED
SOLUTION: • WHAT WAS FOUND? • HOW DID PATI HELP? • THE
RESULT:
At the end of the case study:
A
historical overview with one paragraph on the writer and his or her
history, one paragraph on your company - where appropriate, and one
paragraph on your position / relationship with PATI.
Look
for in upcoming issues:
• Green Building IAQ • Meth
lab detection
CONTACT US
trappedair@pati-air.com Phone: (989) 772-5088 Fax:
(989) 772-5870
PATI 1200 N. Fancher Mt. Pleasant, MI
48858
Learn
more about MoldScanPLUS™ visit us at www.pati-air.com;
Acronym Helper
GC-FID – Gas Chromatography
– Flame Ionization Detector
GC-MS - Gas Chromatography – Mass
Spectrometry
LEED - Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design, program put out by U.S. Green Building Council
PEL –
Permissible Exposure Level
PID – Photoionization
Detector
VOC – Volatile Organic Compound
TLV –
Threshold Limit Value
TWA – Time-Weighted Average
Do you
have your PATI Air Analytical Tool Box ?
To receive a copy
of PATI Air Analytical Tool Box click here Tool
Box
PATI is a consultative air testing lab which means we
encourage you to ask questions whether you are in the planning stage
of an air study or have questions regarding your analytical report.
When planning your next air project be sure to consult your
PATI Tool Box. Quick easy to look up charts are provided for
each analysis. Put our experience to work for you.
|